Subgroup analyses may be misleading - Students 4 Best Evidence

Findings based on results for subgroups of people within a treatment comparison may be misleading. These analyses are often poorly planned and reported.

Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis - The Lancet

The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review - ScienceDirect

Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses

Relapse in clinically stable adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: evidence-based criteria derived by equipercentile linking and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis - The Lancet Psychiatry

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

The difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis - Covidence

Biostatistics Primer: What a Clinician Ought to Know: Subgroup Analyses - ScienceDirect

The 5 min meta-analysis: understanding how to read and interpret a forest plot

JCDD, Free Full-Text