Stockfish at depth 40 fails to solve this puzzle. Can you do it? - Chess Forums

It is white to move and win the game. The position is not legal, however for the sake of puzzle we assume it is. FEN: 1rkr1b1b/2p1pKp1/1pPpP1Pp/3P1p1P/1P3p2/3pp3/8/R1B4N w - - 0 1 P.S. I'm the composer of this puzzle.

Too low?) engine depth analysing your games - Chess Forums

lichess.org on X: This one of the few legitimate Stockfish can't find the answer positions. White to play and win. See the answer and lots of other crazy puzzles in this study

Chess forum by Grandmasters

The most beautiful puzzle that my engine can never solve - Chess Forums - Page 7

Search results for: 'CAVALHEIROS O MEU NOME EST%2525252525C3%252525252581 CORRETO%25252525253B VALDEMAR FONSECA DOS SANTOS%25252525252C %2525252525C3' - Internet Chess Club

We failed a lot of puzzles! Will Stockfish 10 pass all? - Chess Forums

I have been looking at some openings with Leela and Stockfish. Their evaluations of certain positions - specifically some lines in the Goring Gambit - are wildly different. What accounts for this? - Quora

Computer chess - Wikipedia

Square Off Grand Kingdom Set, Automated Chessboard for Adults & Kids, World's Smartest Electronic Chess Board

Why does it take stockfish depth 35 to find mate in 7? - Chess Stack Exchange

Why does Quick Analysis give different scores for the exact same moves? - Chess Forums

Why chess engines still so dumb? : r/chess

Leela Chess Zero - difficult positions. The new world of NN engines! - Leela Chess Zero